Muiruri, K. M., & Abdel Aziz, A. (2025). Evaluating the Evolution of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Construction Projects: A Systematic Review Using Content and Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1370.
Abstract
The construction industry is inherently complex. It involves multiple stakeholders, complex contracts, and significant financial investments. This complexity often leads to disputes, resulting in costly delays and project disruptions. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods have emerged as crucial mechanisms for managing and resolving conflicts in construction projects, offering more efficient and less adversarial solutions than traditional litigation. This paper presents a systematic literature review of existing research on the application of ADR in construction project delivery. The review spans three decades to capture the adoption and impact of the 1987 update to the AIA A201 General Conditions 14th Edition, which introduced provisions governing arbitration in construction contracts. Following the PRISMA framework for study selection, content, trend, and bibliometric analyses were utilized to identify key themes, track the evolution, synthesize findings, and highlight influential contributions. The study finds that while authors agree that ADR methods are generally effective and widely adopted in the construction industry, their implementation has significant variability. Consequently, the study recommends the adoption of hybrid dispute resolution mechanisms (HDRMs). HDRMs combine elements of multiple ADR methods to create flexible approaches that lead to faster, more cost-effective, and more adaptable resolutions in complex disputes.